Someone once told me off when I was an undergraduate for listening too much (as he
thought) to the Ring and trying to
play parts of it on the piano. ‘It’s
like a drug’ he said: ‘before you know it, you’re on a high and risk taking
leave of your senses. Look at Ludwig the
Second who was seduced by Wagner’s music and went mad as a result. It’s what
led to Hitler (a notorious admirer) and the death camps. Stick to Bach and
Beethoven. At the very least, try to have an uneasy conscience about it’
I’ve blogged on this site about my semitic background, and have paid tribute to my German-Jewish grandmother who was one of the most important influences of my life. Before the Third Reich, her family of assimilated Jews loved opera, especially Wagner. And even after she had survived the holocaust and made her home in England, she could never quite get it out of her system though I think she tried. When I was old enough, she asked me to play for her the ravishing Quintet from the last act of Meistersinger. Then it had to be the Prize Song, and then the Prelude. This gave me the permission I needed.
At theological college, one of my lecturers (Dr Jim Packer) asked
if I would like to listen through the Ring
cycle with him, one act every afternoon on the 24 (or so - I've forgotten how many it was) LPs of the legendary
1954 Fürtwängler version. (You have to have a lot of time for Wagner.) After
each act, there was tea and then an hour’s conversation (more a tutorial) about
the significance of Wagner and the Ring. JIP
loved the cycle because, he told me, it was a profound myth of redemption. Its
central theme was salvation through suffering: sacrifice offered so that the era of the
corrupt gods could be ended and a new humanity be born. What could be more
Christian than that? he insisted. Coming as it did from a highly conservative
evangelical theologian, this was a remarkable insight for me as a raw young biblicist
student barely out of his teens. I don’t think JIP ever wrote it up, but I have
never forgotten it.
Rossini once said unkindly that Wagner had good moments but
bad half hours. He is not everyone’s cup of tea, especially not, perhaps, those
who are just as enthusiastically marking
this year’s other bicentenary, the birth of Verdi or the centenary of Britten's birth. I can only say what his
music does for me. And that is, to touch me in places few other composers can
reach.
I once went to a performance of my favourite of all Wagner’s
music dramas, Tristan and Isolde. My
wife bought me a ticket for the front stalls as a birthday present but didn’t
come with me because, she said, she doubted if she would stay awake. It was staged
in a self-conscious symbolist way that for me lost the naturalness of this
profound story of human passion. So I decided to close my eyes and listen, lose
myself in the waves of sublime music rising up from the orchestra pit a few
feet in front of me, and imagine the
drama in my own way. It was one of those experiences I knew I would never forget.
drama in my own way. It was one of those experiences I knew I would never forget.
Should I as a Jewish-Christian man have an uneasy conscience
about something that has touched me so deeply? To love the music is not to
endorse the notorious self-serving egotism the composer was famous for, let
alone the anti-semitism he purveyed. But the Jewish Daniel Barenboim, conductor
of the Proms Ring, has had to negotiate
this issue for himself. That he could give us such a rapturous series of
performances speaks for itself. At the end of tonight’s Götterdämmerung it was several seconds before anyone could bear to
break the long pregnant silence that followed the final cadence. It was truly spellbinding. (Listen to the
last 20 minutes on the BBC Radio 3 iPlayer and judge for yourself.)
Like Caiaphas in St John’s Gospel, I think that Wagner’s
music-dramas speak beyond anything the composer himself could know. Their universal vision gives the clue as to how our broken humanity can be put back
together again. Wagner spoke about the ‘music
of the future’. It is – not just because it was artistically ground-breaking,
but because of the range of its perspective and embrace. Like all great art, it
speaks into our contemporary lives and dilemmas. It recognises who and what we
are.
But for now, as the continuity announcer gently reminded us after
the broadcast, ordinary life goes on. Tomorrow it will be Monday morning.
No comments:
Post a Comment