But as psychoanalysts are fond of reminding us, you may not
say what you mean, but you always mean what you say. In an unguarded moment, a
whole set of attitudes towards the North East is laid bare. It shows how, in
the southern mentality, the ‘idea of north’ is of a remote, strange and
essentially alien place, a liminal borderland between what we know and feel at
home in, and what we don’t know and are subliminally nervous or even afraid of.
The trouble is that it is a very confused perception. There
is certainly ‘desolation’, but it is found not in the remote country but in deprived
urban areas that are the opposite of uninhabited: densely populated
environments where people feel forgotten and abandoned by a those in power who
are supposed to care for the weak and voiceless. By contrast, the remote
fastnesses are in no way the 'desolate' degraded places that
no-one cares about and which are therefore available for exploitation. Far from
it. For it is precisely these landscapes that constitute the North East’s wonderful treasury of national
parks, heritage coasts, areas of outstanding natural beauty, historic buildings and a great deal more.
But we shouldn’t be too quick to dismiss the idea of
desolation. The Idea of North is the
title of a brilliant book by Peter Davidson. Its elusive discipline of
topographics links geography, culture, landscape, literature, art, social
anthropology and the history of ideas. And it turns out that this Howellian southern
fantasy about the north is in fact close to a widespread ‘myth’ that is found
across many different cultures in which ‘north’ with its connotations of remoteness,
darkness and cold is an eloquent symbol of what is alien, chaotic and
threatening. ‘Here be dragons.’
Some make friends with it and embrace it. For
example, W. H. Auden, a midlander, fell in love with the North Pennines as a
boy. He was haunted by the wild astringent fell country with its untamed
climate and the ghosts of its long-dead industries of fluorspar and lead
mining. He would have said that the toughness and desolation of ‘north’ was
precisely what pulled him irreversibly into its gravitational field, 'the solace of fierce landscapes'. He found
his poetic voice in County Durham, at Rookhope in Upper Weardale where, idly dropping
a pebble down a disused mine-shaft, he had a flash of recognition about ‘self
and non-self’ and with his new-found awareness began to write. Would he have
become a great poet without the North?
As a Londoner, I can echo Auden’s love for a part
of England that is not only ‘North’ but is also ‘Not-South’. I wrote Landscapes of Faith: the Christian heritage
of the North East as a tribute. But as I said in the book, we must be
careful not to romanticise either the landscape or the people and communities
who have been shaped by it. It’s important that we speak accurately about the North
East and not be seduced by easy cliché. It’s interesting that much of today’s
response to Lord Howell has been to cite the canon of Northumbrian beautiful
views rather than probe more deeply into what lies under the skin of the North
East. The opposite of desolation may not always be consolation. With its complex history shaped by power and conflict, wealth and poverty, privilege and
servitude, faith and politics, industry and its decline, there are more
ambivalent readings of the region, and these too are aspects of its character.
I don’t know if Lord Howell in some obscure way has intuited
this. Possibly not. But it is how we as North-Easterners react to
this unexpected opportunity to put ourselves on the map that perhaps tells its
own important truth about this region and those of us for whom it is our much-loved home.