What do we think about this?
When it comes to Sunday, I am not a sabbatarian. For one thing, it isn’t the sabbath (which is
Saturday, the seventh day). For another,
there’s no evidence from the New Testament that the early church transferred the
Jewish sabbath to the first day of the week, the day of resurrection. They seemed to have believed that sabbath observance
belonged to the ceremonial law of the Hebrew Bible and like circumcision,
should not be imposed on gentile Christians. Strict sabbatarianism of the kind
you get in the Hebrides is, I think, a misreading of the gospel.
However, I have a lot of sympathy with those who want to
keep Sunday as a day of rest and recreation, and who do not want to see Sunday
trading laws deregulated still further. Let me say at once that I am not
thinking of the corner shop, the souvenir outlet at a leisure facility, the
small-scale operation on the high-street where things are still done on a human
scale. It’s the might of the megastore
that concerns me, the gravitational pull of out of town shopping malls that
have done so much to suck the life out of many town and city centres.
Here’s why I am against this idea.
1.
It isn’t good for human life to be tramlined by
the same routines day in, day out. Sunday offers a different rhythm. It’s a gift that opens up other possibilities
for how we spend our time. Time for
family and friendships. Time for the
things we enjoy. Time to ponder and
reflect. Time for relaxation and
renewal. Time to give to others through
volunteering and service. Time for sport, exercise or culture. And if we are
Christians, time for worship, fellowship, prayer and spiritual growth.
2.
Specifically, those who work in the retail
industry (including many of our poorest paid workers) deserve a weekly break
like anyone else. It is one thing for
the legislation to protect the rights of such people. Experience shows that it can be hard for
employees at the bottom of the pyramid to resist strong pressures from the top to
work in their free time. The unions are right to point out that if the law is
further deregulated, these pressures will increase, risking a high cost to
employees’ mental and physical health, and to their relationships and quality
of life.
3.
Most important of all is what such a move would
say about our values. It would carry the
strong message that what matters most in life is the freedom to shop when we
want for however long we want. This supposed
public appetite for shopping is being elevated almost to the level of a human
right. We should resist this
vigorously. The relentless tide of consumerism
is possibly the most eroding of all the forces of modern life that are eating
away at our wellbeing as individuals and as a society. It says that what matters most is what can be
traded, bought and sold as commodities.
It proclaims that the endless quest to acquire more and still more should be
endorsed. It encourages greed, and in
particular, envy, possibly the most deadly sin of the seven. It says that we are in love with money and
the power it gives us.
As regular readers of this blog know, my wife
and I spend time regularly in France. There, Sunday trading is tightly regulated. In a country that is officially far more secularised
than the UK, whose mantra is laïcisme,
this is not because of the influence of religious faith. It’s more to do with the strong bonds of
family life and the unions’ resolve to uphold it. So Sunday is a marvellously peaceful day with
its own pace of life. Families make the
most of it. Sport and leisure flourish. It’s true that people do not go to church in
huge numbers. It’s also true that in
some towns, some smaller shops are open for business. But not the big supermarkets and
megastores. So the traffic is lighter
and the atmosphere less febrile. The
continental Sunday, once much maligned in protestant England, has a
wholesomeness about it that we have now almost lost here.
I have to say that I am gloomy about the future. By a curious act of group-think, the
coalition has got itself believing that unregulated Sunday trading will
encourage greater consumer spend and therefore help get the economy out of the
pit in which it has been stuck for so long.
I doubt this very much. At best,
it will attenuate the public’s shopping habits across twelve hours rather than
six. But the evidence of this economic
crisis is that the public is not as naïve as the government appears to think. We
are not inclined to part with more money than we can afford simply because more
shopping hours are available to us. Internet
shopping is available 24 hours a day, but it is not encouraging consumers to
spend in ways that stimulate demand and therefore create capacity and productivity.
My concern is as much with the symbolic effect of this
likely change, and for what it says about our collective understanding of what
our life together in our contemporary society should be like. There is something worryingly cynical about a government that smuggles in this unwanted change under the banner of the Olympics when the original rhetoric promised otherwise. So I hope that Christians will resist it, not for
spurious sabbatarian reasons, but because we care about human life and its
flourishing. And because we follow a way
that points the human heart to where treasure truly lies.
