But it was compulsive viewing. This was not the theatre of stardom, 'us' watching 'them' dazzle us. This theatre belonged to the thousands of ordinary people who took part in it. And therefore it belonged to us all. I didn’t expect to enjoy it but I did. I didn’t think I would be moved but I was.
Everyone said that the director Danny Boyle was faced with an impossible task. Not simply how to follow Bejing four years ago,
but how to present our country to the world.
In that, he succeeded brilliantly.
It was an astonishing technical feat that left so many
unforgettable images, many of them of great beauty. Who will forget the nostalgic rural idyll
being torn apart, those industrial chimneys forcing their way out of the ground,
the Wagner-like forging of the Olympic ring, or the Olympic cauldron being born
out of fire? Or the scores of nurses with
their hospital beds, or Peter Pan and other themes from children’s literature,
or Mr Bean (alumnus of the Chorister School here at Durham) at the keyboard during Chariots
of Fire? As theatre, ballet, ceremony, call it what you will, it was hard to fault. It was entirely different from Bejing (thankfully), and in its originality, from any other sporting event I can recall. It was far, far better.
But more important was what the ceremony had to say about
us. Is there such a thing as our
national character, a collective British personality type if you like? The opening ceremony isn’t simply a
shop-window for the world: come and spend at GB plc. It’s a mirror held up to ourselves. The important question is whether we
recognise ourselves in what we see. And
that comes down to telling the truth about us. That is a far bigger challenge than pyrotechnics
and clever effects.
I think we saw some important things that spoke about Britishness
in the 21st century. I’m not
thinking so much of pride in the beauty of our landscapes or our pioneering achievements,
though it is good to remind the world – and ourselves - about them. I’m more interested in intangible values like
care and compassion, inclusivity and diversity, flair and creativity, modesty and understatement, the confidence
to be at ease with ourselves, our ability to question ourselves, our enjoyment of life. We saw something of our complexity: this was an event to probe beneath the surface and explore. It was good to see humour play a big part
in the show, something we British are surely best at in the world. The trouble with sport is that it takes
itself absurdly seriously much of the time. The large
dose of subversive irony and self-deprecation (involving even Her Majesty) came
over as authentic. But the fun was at
no-one’s expense. It was all done with affection.
Of pomposity and deference there was none.
Of respect: plenty.
In this complex, richly textured offering, what about the
spirituality of the British? Here again,
my expectations of a completely secular ceremony with religion airbrushed out
were surprised. The lone chorister singing ‘Jerusalem’ at the start (an echo of
‘Once in Royal’ at the beginning of the Nine Lessons and Carols?)seemed to announce a spiritual dimension to the evening. Danny Boyle’s programme note
speaks about the vision of ‘building Jerusalem’. Blake’s great poem is subtly ambiguous: it
would have been so easy to blast it out in the arena as if it were the Last
Night of the Proms. Instead, Boyle was
true to Blake's text, which is his Christian vision of a just and caring society. But it has to be formed and helped to flourish with the native gifts and characteristics that make us what we are. This nuanced awareness is, I think, an
aspect of the spirituality of our islands that we cherish. It’s embedded in the way we do liturgy and
theology. In its eloquence and simplicity, that moment carried great power.
The other moment where faith broke through was in the
invitation to remember ‘those who are not here’. After the spectacle and the celebration, what
heralded the arrival of the athletes was not a grand rhetorical climax but the silencing of the crowd, an act of recollection, the words of a prayer. For yes, unbelievably, we had all of ‘Abide
with me’ sung quietly while a simple ballet on the theme of being lost and
found was performed on the stage. It was
a clever choice because of its Cup Final resonances; and yet once again, it was
subverted in a way that restored meaning to a great hymn and personalised
it. ‘Hold thou thy cross before my
closing eyes / Shine through the gloom and point me to the skies’: who would
have thought we would hear such words charged with Christian hope and expectation
at an Olympic opening ceremony? For me it was among the most moving aspects of the
whole event.
There is more to 'spirituality' than when it surfaces and becomes explicit. It has an intuitive side that doesn't get expressed in words but is still alive in most people's experience of life. Perhaps in the joy and exuberance of last night, something more about life and about God was hinted at. Perhaps some may have experienced it as a kind of liturgy. Perhaps, even, the sight of thousands of people of every age, background and ethnicity throwing themselves into this genuinely democratic celebration offered a glimpse of Jerusalem and of the kingdom of heaven itself.
When words of faith do get uttered, especially when we are not expecting them, we should listen not only to what they say but how they are said. This was what I did not foresee last night. And for once, I’m prepared to trust how I responded as I watched. I believe there was spiritual truth to be glimpsed in what we saw and heard. Yes, it was a performance and a great one. But the trick was to make it more than a mere performance, to enable it to say something intelligent and interesting, even profound, about how we are to ourselves and to our world. And, the ceremony seemed to be saying, how we are before God too.
When words of faith do get uttered, especially when we are not expecting them, we should listen not only to what they say but how they are said. This was what I did not foresee last night. And for once, I’m prepared to trust how I responded as I watched. I believe there was spiritual truth to be glimpsed in what we saw and heard. Yes, it was a performance and a great one. But the trick was to make it more than a mere performance, to enable it to say something intelligent and interesting, even profound, about how we are to ourselves and to our world. And, the ceremony seemed to be saying, how we are before God too.